|

Five
Myths
About
Public Education
by
Tory and Barb Shelton

INTRO
FROM BARB:
What follows is the first half of a paper that my son, Tory, and
I wrote together. This is the vehicle I used to teach him how to
write an essay. We did every bit of it together, though, really, I
"pulled" it out of him, a word and phrase at a time. (We informed his
teacher that we had done it this way, and he was not only "just fine"
with it, but also commented that it was a good way for him to
learn! "OJT"! "On the Job Training." )
This was for a
"Christian Ethics" class that Tory took at a private Christian school,
which he had to take in order to be able to play sports at the school.
(Basketball is one of his greatest loves ~ something I was obviously
not able to provide as a homeschool mom.) The teacher wrote this
comment on the cover of the essay, next to the "98 / A" grade: "I
almost want to homeschool now. Good job."
Because this paper was done for and within the context of a private
school setting, we kept it to "public school" downfalls. However, most
of the myths that are thought about public school ~ especially numbers
1, 3, and 4 ~ are also applicable to the private school setting as
well, so feel free to insert the word "traditional" for "public." |
People
today tend to deem the public schools the ultimate authority on, and
the best place to receive an education. In order to make such an
assumption, one would have to believe in several myths, although
sometimes (if not usually) unknowingly. In this paper I will present
five of these commonly believed myths, along with evidence supporting
the fact that public education is not, contrary to popular belief, the
ideal form of education.

MYTH #1: "Public schools provide positive,
appropriate
socialization."
Many
people assume that because their children are around other children of
the same age, they are getting wholesome, proper socialization. They
assume that children are best able to socialize each other, that they
are the best examples for each other. But by taking a look at reality,
we see that children are superficial: they form in cliques, they
ridicule children with less social standing, charisma, talent or looks,
and they degrade anyone who is "different." Dr. Raymond Moore, who has
collected and studied much research in education, said:
"Negative,
me-first sociability is born from more peer group association and fewer
meaningful parental contact and responsibility experiences in the home
during the first 8 to 12 years. The early peer influence generally
brings an indifference to family values which defy parents' correction.
The child does not yet consistently understand the "why" of parental
demands... So he does what comes naturally: He adapts to the ways of
his agemates because 'everybody's doing it,' and gives parent values
the back of his little hand."
Chances are that many children lose
their self esteem on the playground at recess from the whole "King of
the Mountain" scenario. Adults in authority oftentimes stand by and
watch this whole process happen because they think it is only
"natural," and helps the children learn to be strong and interact with
each other, to "toughen them up" and "prepare them for real life."
However, in all actuality, what's really happening is that this is
grinding down on their self worth, wounding them, and weighing down on
them for many years to come. "Survival of the fittest" is the motto of
the children on the playground, benefiting the few stronger ones, but
devaluing the weaker ones, the majority. Dr. James Dobson, founder of
Focus on the Family, said,
"I
have seen kids dismantle one another, while parents and teachers stood
passively by and observed the 'socialization' process. I've seen the
socialization theory in action, and it doesn't hold much water."

MYTH #2: "Public education is
religiously neutral."
It
is commonly thought that the educational material presented in public
schools is non-biased and is not partial to any certain belief. In
truth, the public school could not be any more biased against God or
any of His morals or principles. Karl Reed, a writer on moral and
education issues, said:
"Public
education has taken on the characteristics of a religion, promising
answers for all ills of life and nation. ... That 'religion,' or belief
system, incorporates into its dogma a faith in 'The Secular State,'
which is now carved in the likeness of God. Along with holding to a
belief in 'The State' has come a total lack of confidence in God and
his foundation for true primary education. State-run schools have
taught Americans to put faith in 'The State' instead of in God and His
way."
Horace Mann, who lived in the 1800's,
was called "the father of public education." Here is what he saw as
being appropriate and ideal and for the future of education of
America's children:
"What
the church has been for medieval man, the public school must become for
democratic and rational man. God will be replaced by the concept of the
public good. The common (public) schools shall create a more far-seeing
intelligence and a pure morality than has ever existed among
communities of men."
Mr. Mann, a Unitarian, couldn't be any
further from the truth in his anti-Christian beliefs. He established an
abhorrently erroneous standard for the future of educating the people
of our country! It's like he took the truth, poured it into a blender,
and pulverized it. He then added his own seasonings and fed it to our
country. Unfortunately, they drank; they bought into it and accepted
his philosophy as the way things should be. The results today are quite
obviously not the way God intended education to be. Cathy Duffy, author
of "Government Nannies", said:
"Public
schools were instituted to modify the behavior of children rather than
to educate them... Most of the curriculum being used in public schools
is designed to meet educational goals that differ radically from [those
of Christians']. So I believe that Christian parents should not send
their children to public schools if there is any other option
available. I believe that when we do so, in many, but not all cases we
are handing our children over to the enemy for anti-Christian
indoctrination."

MYTH #3:
"Traditional schools have
the best
methods for providing the highest
quality in
education."
While
some students do well in the public school system, many fall through
the cracks, only to become another statistic, never fully achieving
their potential. They get lost in the system, with the blame usually
being placed on them, the students. They are labeled "underachievers"
or "slackers" when, in fact, it may be the system that is hindering
them from succeeding. John Taylor Gatto, New York State Teacher of the
Year in 1990, said:
"...I began to wonder,
reluctantly, whether it was possible that being in school itself was
what was dumbing them down. Was it possible I had been hired not to
enlarge children's power, but to diminish it? That seemed crazy on the
face of it, but slowly I began to realize that the bells and the
confinement, the crazy sequences, the age-segregation, the lack of
privacy, the constant surveillance, and all the rest of the national
curriculum of schooling were designed exactly as if someone had set out
to prevent children from learning how to think and act, to coax them
into addiction and dependant behavior."
Many people have memories of only
the good times they had during their school experience. For example
they remember the new crayons, lunch boxes, recess, pep rallies,
sports, extra-curricular activities, etc. But on the flip side, they
overlook, or have simply forgotten, the sometimes harsh realities of
their daily schooling. Ron Thruelsen, a father concerned about the
decline of education, said:
"By
definition, public schools are supposed to provide a quality education
for all children, but this obviously is impossible. Quality education
will go to a small group of students whose learning and social style
fits the school system. For most of the rest, it will be a dreary
marathon to be endured for many years. For the children on the fringe,
school is a place of intimidation, frustration, and endless failure to
reach someone else's expectations."

MYTH #4: "Better education requires
higher spending."
It
is obvious every voting year that the public schools think they need
more money to be able to give a better education to the children in
their care. In reality, more funding is not necessarily what is needed,
but instead a better spending of the money they already have. Their
money could be better spent if they had more of a concept of what real
education is. According to the U.S. Dept. of Education, about $250
billion was spent on public schools for the 1991-92 school year.
This means that approximately $6000 was spent on each pupil in the
public schools for that year. Diane Ravitch, a national leader in the
area of education, stated:
"Spending
is up and achievement is down. Per-pupil spending has nearly doubled
from approximately $3000 to just under $6000 per student. However, the
SAT scores continue to decline."
It could be thought that this money is well-spent, going toward improving the facilities
and conditions in which our children are educated, but here is a shocking statistic I found in a book called
"The Right Choice: Homeschooling":
"Only
60 percent of this money even gets to the classroom. At least 40
percent of the money goes to the bureaucracy. According to Albert
Shanker, President of the American Federation of Teachers: 'One of the
major differences between American schools and all others in the world
is that we spend half of our money on bureaucracy, whereas the other
schools in the world don't spend more than 20 percent... You know, we
have about one teacher to every twenty-five kids in the country, *but
we have one supervisor for every six teachers.*'"

MYTH #5: "Education can be complete
without God and the Bible."
It
is commonly believed that it is not necessary to include God in the
curriculum used to educate. But in actuality, education was originally
intended for God to be the center and the driving force behind it.
George Washington said: "It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the
Bible." His successor, John Adams, said: "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any
other."
Without God at the helms of education, this country has been in moral
decline, and will continue to do so until people begin to wake up to
the truth and do something about it. One option would be to pull out of
the public school system, with the two alternatives being either to
send their children to a private school, or to educate their children
themselves at home. Or they can stay in the public school system and
try to influence it for the good. Which path they choose would all
depend on how they feel God leads them.
In Websters 1828 dictionary, the word "education" is defined as:
"The
bringing up, as of a child; instruction; formation of manners.
Education comprehends that series of instruction and discipline which
is intended to enlighten the understanding, correct the temper, and
form the manners and habits of youth, and fit them for usefulness in
their future stations. To give children a good education in manners,
arts and science, is important; to give them a religious education is
indispensable, and an immense responsibility rests on parents and
guardians who neglect these duties."
With the public schools being in
the state they are now in, and with the values they now possess, are
they capable of producing God-fearing people or accomplishing what
education was really meant to be? It is astounding to think that the
institution into which we pour millions of our tax dollars is the same
institution which has banned God, and therefore has banned the very
principles and morals upon which our country was founded.
For more resourses, check out the
Renewing the Mind on Education category in the online catalog.
|